| Make substantive contributions
to the WebCT bulletin board discussions.
INTRODUCTION
The field of e-learning and multimedia
project management is an evolving one wherein learning comes both from
frequent review of the current literature and by sharing experiences and
perspectives with other professionals in the field. This task is designed
to allow you to engage in such activities through an asynchronous online
learning environment.
TASK
1. Post responses incorporating your
insights into the course readings and your experiences with course tasks.
Your comments can be based on the questions posed by the instructor, mentors,
and/or guest speakers as well as on comments made by your classmates on
topics related to management of instructional technology projects.
2. Contributions
to online discussions can be made at anytime. The class will "meet" online
every week, but hopefully your engagement in the online discussion will
be evident throughout the semester.
3. A sense of
humor is welcome, but it is very important to treat others with courtesy
and respect.
This task is worth 15 points.
Assessment Rubric
Excellent (14 - 15 points)
The participant consistently posted insightful
comments and questions that prompted additional on-topic discussion.
The participant consistently helped clarify
or synthesize other group members' ideas.
If disagreeing with another participant's
ideas, the participant stated disagreements or objections clearly, yet
politely.
Good (11 - 13 points)
The participant was sometimes lacking in one
or two of the items listed for "Excellent" level participation.
The participant sometimes had to be prompted
or coaxed to participate.
The participant usually, but not always, expressed
herself or himself clearly.
Below Expectations (6 - 10
points)
The participant was often lacking in two or
three of the items listed for "Excellent" level participation.
The participant often had to be prompted or
coaxed to participate.
The participant rarely expressed herself or
himself clearly.
Failure (0 - 5 points)
The participant was often lacking in all of
the items listed for "Excellent" level participation.
The participant was extremely reluctant to
participate, even when prompted.
The participant was rude or abusive to other
course participants.
|
