Task 3: Web-Based Instructional Technology Resource
For this task, you have a choice of creating a Timeline or a WebQuest.For this task, you have three choices. Please confirm your choice with the instructor before beginning your work on this task.
|
This task is designed to develop an instructional, inquiry-oriented, activity that requires the use of web-based resources. "WebQuests (http://webquest.sdsu.edu/) are designed to use learners' time well, to focus on using information rather than looking for it, and to support learners' thinking at the levels of analysis, synthesis and evaluation." This task also gives you an opportunity to experience collaborative learning with technology. Each resource will be developed your team. Please
consider this as an opportunity to consolidate and organize your
new knowledge and skills about instructional technology into
a resource which can serve several functions: Feedback will work as following: First, you will deliver your draft version for review. Another team will collaboratively critique your Web project and provide a wealth of feedback. Your final Web Project will be due following the feedback (see, syllabus for specific dates). The feedback should be provided based on the rubric for this assignment (see below). As in all the tasks in this course, creativity is encouraged! This is an opportunity to "imagineer" a practical application for the WWW. |
Components:
| The WebQuest activity should include an introduction to a situation, a task for students, a list of annotated web resources used in the activity, procedures for students, assessment criteria, conclusion, and teacher's notes (purpose, goals, objectives, management, potential challenge spots, etc.). The lesson should be designed so that it would be impossible or improbable to do in a classroom setting without Web-access. This means that you cannot just post a resource that you can find in your textbook, or a lesson that you have already used in your classroom. The web design should be visually appealing and easy to navigate, and the instructions should be clear enough that any teacher or student know how to get through the activity. |
Suggested Strategies:
|
Visit the Web Quest home page, and read some descriptions and view sample lessons. Bernie Dodge's Buidling Blocks of a WebQuest provide a description of the structure of a Web Quest. You can also view some of Evan Glazer's web-based lessons, especially the the year long vacation. Read over the a previous' class discussion about advantages, disadvantages, and strategies for using the web as a medium for learning. An exemplary Web Quest, Searching for China, illustrates many of these issues. Prepare a preliminary design document that includes your activity and its components. Ask your peers, your instructor, and others for feedback. Once you have conceived of a preliminary design, begin prototyping the site using favorite web authoring tools. Submit your site to frequent reviews (formative evaluation) by friends, family, and representatives of the target audience.
|
Technical Aspects
| Component | Incomplete/Unacceptable (1) | Good (2-3) | Outstanding (4-5) |
| Grammar | Numerous grammar, punctuation, or spelling errors. | Some spelling mistakes, awkward or improper word choice, or punctuation problems. | Everything is spelled correctly and all grammar is correct. No punctuation problems. |
| Visual Design | Visually unappealing. Showing little adherence to good design principles. | Mostly adheres to good design principles but includes some inappropriate elements. | Clean, clear. Showing strong adherence to design principles. Visually appealing. |
| Functionality | Multiple broken links or other functional problems. | Most links and other elements work properly but there are a few problems. | All technical aspects of the page work properly. |
| Ease of Use | Difficult to navigate around site | Navigation is adequate, but not particularly obvious. | Navigation is user friendly and apparent. |
WebQuest Components
| Component | Incomplete/Unacceptable (1-4) | Good (5-7) | Outstanding (8-10) |
| Introduction | Not very engaging - little done to motivate students. Topic unclear. | More or less motivating. Most students would likely become engaged. Somewhat unclear about topic. | Interesting, relevant, and motivating. Clear topic. |
| Task | No goals or clear outcomes described. | Somewhat unclear in discussion of goals or outcomes. Some outcomes may not be appropriate for your students. | Clear and appropriate outcomes and goals provided. |
| Question(s) | Little higher order thinking required - superficial task. Questions not clearly stated. | Most of the questions being asked require some higher order or critical thinking. Questions are appropriately challenging. | Questions require higher order and critical thinking. They are appropriately challenging. |
| Process | Steps not spelled out. Students or substitute teacher would be unclear about how to work through the process of accomplishing this task. | Steps are recognizable but students or substitute teacher might be somewhat unclear about how to complete the project. | Process is clearly described in enough detail for anyone to teach or learn with this WebQuest. |
| Evaluation | Difficult to tell how students will be evaluate (what project outcome should be and what criteria for grading is) | Evaluation is product oriented rather than process oriented. Evaluation is not clear about how students will show growth. | Evaluation is clear and evaluated the critical elements of the process as well as the product. Reward growth. |
| Conclusion | Little or no higher order thinking (such as synthesizing) required to answer questions. | Somewhat reflective questions requiring some level of higher order thinking. | Reflective questions requiring higher order thinking. Focus on what was learned through the project. |
| Teacher Page | Little or no guideance provided to other teachers. | Guidance is provided, but only minimally. | Not only is guidance adequate, but all resources to supplement classroom materials are provided. |
Option 3 - Modify a WebCT "backpack" for one of the weekly
topics
Description:
Your task is to review and redesign one of the backpacks for this course (EDIT 6100) in WebCT. You will have to search for readings, create quiz questions, propose activities, and any other instructional events that you believe will help improve the chosen topic. For this assignment, your instructor will be your "client." You will have to create a contract with your instructor. The contract should include: your chosen backpack, your rationale for making modifications to the backpack, your initial plan, and your own rubric for evaluation. If you choose this option, you must notify your instructor by date specified in the syllabus, so that a contract can be agreed upon, and benchmark/timeline can be devised.
Option 4 - Web-Based Timeline
Analyzing the Evolution of an Instructional Technology
Description:
|
This
task is designed to develop a historical timeline about an instructional
media, instructional method, or technological tool used in your work
environment. You may want to look at computer based training, web based
training, cognitive tools, performance support systems, etc. Your goal
will be to integrate the ideas you have learned this semester with
an examination of how and why your chosen media, method, or tool: This task also gives you an opportunity to experience collaborative learning with technology. Each resource will be developed by a two-person team. Please
consider this as an opportunity to consolidate and organize your new
knowledge and skills about instructional technology into a resource
which can serve several functions: You and your collaborator will give a brief presentation of your Web Resource in class. You will receive feedback from your peers and the course instructor which you can use to refine your resource. As in all the tasks in this course, creativity is encouraged! This is an opportunity to "imagineer" a practical application of the WWW. |
Components:
| The web timeline should incorporate how the resource has been used in the past, present, and will be used in the future. It should incorporate web and text references to support facts and arguments. The timeline should be visually appealing and easy to navigate. |
Suggested Strategies:
|
Identify an instructional medium, method, or tool that you find resourceful. Locate web-based and/or paper-based sources from a variety of time periods to get a sense of the intended purpose of the resource, as well as how it has transformed throughout its existence. The following web timelines can give you a sense of different design styles and organization of content:
You should also locate current sources that discuss the resource's potential use for the future. Prepare a preliminary design document that includes sections about the past, present, and future of the resource, as well as design ideas. Ask your peers, your instructor, and others for feedback. Once you have conceived of a preliminary design, begin prototyping the site using your favorite web authoring tools. Submit your site to frequent reviews (formative evaluation) by friends, family, and representatives of the target audience. Continue to develop the site until the first draft is due when you will get team feedback on your work. Then, you'll have time to refine and/or extend the site before it is due at the end of the course. Here is an example of a timeline created by previous students in this course: References: There are numerous online
resources about web page design. |
Assessment Rubric
| Criterion | Weight |
|
|
|
| The site represents an original resource related to instructional technology |
|
The site replicates resources that are available elsewhere | The site provides an new twist on a popular theme related to IT | The site is a highly original contribution to the field |
| The site examines the historical evolution of an IT resource | 25% | The historical perspective is limited and unorganized | The historical perspective is somewhat clear and organized | The historical perspective is clear and well-organized |
| The site has accurate and timely content | 15% | The content validity of the site is inadequate | The content validity of the site is adequate | The content validity of the site is very professional |
| The site's usability is defensible | 15% | How to navigate and use the site is unclear | With a little effort, a user can figure out how to navigate this site | The usability of this site meets highly professional standards |
| The quality and substance of the site indicates that a significant effort has been made to develop it |
|
The site appears to have been produced in haste | The site appears to have been produced with an average level of effort | The site reflects substantive effort and care in its production |