EDIT 6360
ISearch
Assignment
Description and Rubric
Mode: Individual
updated 8-30-06
Under development; this
version for AASL Report
Assignment by Dr. Julie Tallman
Complete an I-Search research project
of your choosing as
explained
within the topic choice section of the Joyce/Tallman I-Search text. You
will use
and reflect on the information literacy skills and strategies suggested
by the I-Search
text for your own search, keep a reflective journal of the research
process, carry
out an I-Search as described in the Joyce/Tallman text, choose a format
for presentation,
and submit the final I-Search product to your classmates and me as an
attachment
to a WebCT message. There are times when an I-Search is too personal
for public
consumption. If that is the case with you and your choice of topic, I
will work
with you to keep it comfortably private. Your topic choice has to be a
burning question
that you've been thinking about, preferably something outside of your
academic life,
for it to provide the motivation you need to experience. Very few
questions are
outside the scope of this assignment. You will have ownership of your
research and
your topic content. My role is to guide you in the I-Search research
and writing
process.
I-Search Project.
Complete the following tasks as
you
proceed through the I-Search. The purpose underlying these tasks is to
experience
what your students should be experiencing. Thus, under conferencing,
please confer
with me via email about your choice of topic and why your topic is
choosing you
(reference the text for an explanation of this statement).
Read Joyce/Tallman text and submit
abstract
and reflections on process by January 24th.
I think it is critically important that you fully understand
the research
process, in this case through the I-Search process.
Most of us have been taught outlining, note card
use, creating bibliographies. But we
haven't
learned how to ask questions and how to turn a general topic into a
researchable
question. The researchable question allows
us to identify appropriate information that we can evaluate,
synthesize, and apply
to our question. With a general topic, we
remain foggy about what we need to find out and too often become
distracted with
extraneous information, interesting but not relevant to our search. It makes the final synthesis and presentation
of the search much harder to complete successfully.
Through this exercise, I want you to start thinking
about your usual research process and how it compares and contrasts
with what you
read in this text. Write about these
points
in your reflection. Why do you think it would be important not to skip
any of these
steps even if you have done plenty of research projects before?
Choose topic. Describe how and why
you chose your topic. Due
January 24th.
Use the webbing technique to
identify possible topics and their
subtopics. Then transfer the most likely
and interesting
topic to the pre-notetaking sheet. Write
down in the first column what you know about the topic, in the second
column what
you think you don't know about the topic, and in the third column what
you would
like to know about the topic in the form of a "how" or "why"
question. Why is this topic important to
you and how does it affect your life? Clearly, you will need to read
the text to
find out what these terms mean.
Submit weekly journal entries. Due
each Monday during the
I-Search project.The Joyce/Tallman
text has content on journaling
in your learning-log. Reread this material
to understand the types of entries you need to make.
Your final I-Search product will include a story
of your search as well as what you find out about your topic. If your I-Search results in an artifact (i.e.,
scrapbook, website), you will need to include a short essay with it
addressing the
following points (not an elaborate paper). This short essay needs also
to include
your reflections on the use of information literacy strategies and how
you reacted
to them. Your weekly journal entry should
include the following items: 1) your search story for that week, 2)
your use of
information literacy strategies like the pre-notetaking sheet and how
they helped
or didn't help you--if they didn't help, what other kinds of strategies
did you
use instead that accomplished the same task? and 3) your double-entry
drafts (see
text for explanation of what these are) from your information searching
and interviews.
Your first journal will be due on September 9 with topic choice. Your last entry will be due at the time the
I-Search
is finished on March 7th in the form of the statements on
pre-searching and searching
strategies.
Use and reflect on the information
literacy strategies included
in the Joyce/Tallman
text. Keep the reflections in your weekly
journal. Pay particular attention to journaling, webbing, using the
pre-notetaking
sheet to develop questions, reflective reading strategies, double-entry
drafting,
and peer editing. This task is to help you reflect on the
usefulness of each
of these strategies.
Address the following questions
from the list on p. 71-72 of
Joyce/Tallman
text and turn in with your final I-Search product:
Has the student chosen a personally
meaningful topic?
Does the topic involve decision making and problem solving?
Does the student display an ability to use a number of strategies to
choose a topic--i.e.,
webbing, index searching, general reading, and interviewing parents and
people who
know her?
Does the student understand the topic's limitations and is the student
willing to
change topics if necessary?
Can the student create original search questions that move beyond facts
and that
facilitate solving the problem or making the decision?
Can the student demonstrate use of information tools, such as
electronic indexes
and tables of contents, to choose key words that lead to open-ended
search questions?
Can the student focus her topic down to a reasonable number of related
questions?
Does the student show organizational strengths through an ability to
prioritize
potential topics, search questions, resource choices, and alternative
solutions?
Has the student looked at a
sufficient variety of sources or
interviewed appropriate
contacts/experts in the content area?
Has the student used a combination
of sources, e.g., books, journals,
interviews?
Does the student demonstrate strong
information literacy skills in
locating, assessing,
and using sources?
Does the student demonstrate an
ability to discard irrelevant sources,
as evidenced
through learning log notes and bibliography?
Does the student demonstrate use of
an organizing technique, such as
highlighting
and marginal notes, for notetaking?
Does the learning log show evidence
of adequate reflection on gathered
information?
Does the student show an organized
approach to solving the problem or
making the
decision?
Does the student apply information
from a variety of sources for
solving the problem
or making the decision?
Has the student actually followed
through on what the student wanted to
accomplish
through the search questions?
Is the paper or presentation clear
and well supported?
Does the presentation reveal clear
evidence of effort by the student to
carry through
the strategies taught through the unit?
Are the conclusions in the paper or
presentation based on information
gathered through
multiple sources?
Can the student articulate a
personal search strategy to be used in a
future assignment?
Reference
Joyce, M., & Tallman, J. (1997). Making the writing and research connection with the I-search process. NY: Neal-Schuman. ISBN: 1-55570-252-x.
| Criterion | Unacceptable |
Acceptable |
Target "Acceptable" column plus: |
5 points |
[]Time
for a conference
[]Needs
reworking
|
|
|
| Choose
topic. Describe how and why you chose
it in
your journal for this date. Include your web in your journal entry. Due
Monday,
January 24th 5 points |
[]Time
for a conference []Needs reworking |
||
| Submit weekly journal
entries detailing and reflecting on your search progress. Due
each Monday during I-Search project. Use and reflect on the information
literacy strategies included in the Joyce/Tallman text. Include
these reflections in your weekly journal. Pay particular
attention to commenting on the value of journaling, webbing, using the
pre-notetaking sheet to develop questions, reflective reading
strategies, double-entry drafting, and peer editing. I want to
know why you agree or disagree about the value of these strategies for
helping students acknowledge their own most effective research process. 3 points |
[]Time
for a conference []Needs reworking |
||
| Final
Product plus answers to the questions
contained
in "Does your journal and presentation demonstrate presearch strategies
. .
. " listed on p. 71-72 of Joyce/Tallman text. Why? Prepare a short
statement
and email this to me when you post your final product. Final product
and statements
due March 7th. 10 points |
[]Time
for a conference []Needs reworking |
||
| 1.1 Efficient and Ethical Information-Seeking Behavior 4 points |
[]Little
or no evidence of the research process []No differentiation of user needs []No identification or support of student interests or needs []Legal and ethical practices ignored |
[]Modeling
of strategies to locate, evaluate, and use information for specific
purposes []Identifies and addresses student interests and motivations []Interacts with learning community to access, communicate, and interpret intellectual content []Adheres to and communicates legal and ethical policies |
[]Advocates for and
demonstrates effective use of current and relevant information
processes and resources, including emerging technologies []Models a variety of effective strategies to locate, evaluate, and use information in a variety of formats for diverse purposes []Plans reference services, using traditional and electronic services that are comprehensive and address the needs of all users []Models and teaches legal and ethical practices |
| 2.3 Information Literacy Curriculum 3 points |
[]Develops an information literacy curriculum which is in isolation from content curriculum and which relies on traditional print-only library research tools and location and access skills | []Employs strategies to
integrate the information literacy curriculum with content curriculum []Incorporates technology to promote efficient and equitable access to information beyond print resources []Assists students to use technology to access, analyze, and present information |
[]Works to ensure that
responsibility for an integrated information literacy curriculum is
shared across curricular areas throughout the school []Advocates for the information skills curriculum in order to assure appropriate learning experiences for all students, and to address the academic needs of the school community |
| Total | . | . | . |
Expires 5-31-07
All rights reserved
http://it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger/i-search
.html
Update Log: 8/30: first draft posted
The
content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily
reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia
or the University System of Georgia.