
Applied Project
Draft (AP1)
Assignment
Description
Tags
Value: 15 points
updated 1-15-09
| C6
blog
entry about this assignment
4-6-09: see change notes for 2010
Purpose
of this
Assignment
In this assignment, the Applied
Project begins to come together. Most (or all) of the required
components have appeared in earlier drafts.
Task
In an online format, assemble all pieces of the applied project
together, in the order below. Respond to all prior feedback.
Proofread this draft carefully (not because I will count off much for
mistakes, but because each one slows the process down significantly).
Use first person throughout - you are
telling the story of what you did and what you learned.
Once again: conciseness is good; there
is no need to write volumes of narrative, except for where it seems to
be genuinely needed.
Use the Tag
List, just for this
draft. Highlight each in yellow - many will appear in
headings. You may remove these tags in subsequent drafts.
Components
- Overview: From the Researchable
Question assignment:
- Introduction (write this last):
tell us what you will tell us.
- Background: the problem or
situation that gave rise to your project
- Research Question
- Importance of the study
- Context (if not provided up to
this point)
- Review of the Literature (from EDIT
7320)
- Provide the graphic you developed
in EDIT 7320.
- List the most important relevant
literature points in a bulleted format.
- Design: From the Project
Design (this section explains what you did in past tense and why)
- Overall design identification
- Participants
- Data collection story:
techniques, procedures, instruments/materials (as developed in Instruments
and Materials assignment)
- Data sources
- Analysis:
describe how you analyzed the data (past tense)
- Results
- Objective findings from data with
all support charts, tables, etc..
- Discussion
and Conclusion
- "Answer(s)" to RQ
- Explanations, interpretations,
discussion of findings (may include your labeled subjective expert
opinions)
- Conclusions (a list of the things
you confidently learned from this project, whether part of the RQ or
not)
- Recommendations, implications for
practice, educational significance (may address to together or as
separate sections)
- Reflection of what this study
meant to you and your practice
- Overall conclusion
- References, Appendices
- Feedback table
- Updated Timeline
- Self-assessment
- Tags
applied
Submission
Format
- As the request of IRB, please
add this statement near the front of your project: "This Applied
Project was reviewed under the Instructor Exemption for Class Projects,
EDIT 7650 (Applied Project in Instructional Technology), under the
direction of Dr. Mary Ann Fitzgerald and Dr. [insert advisor's name if
not MAF]."
- Ideally, this project takes
the form of a miniature website. See C7
Examples and Jennifer
Parker's. Be sure to guard privacy of
participants. In a pinch,
submit a single Word document into the dropbox.
- Send the URL to me and to your advisor.
- Self-assess on the rubric - submit the
rubric
to the WebCT dropbox. Include the URL at the top of the rubric.
- I plan to submit my feedback
in the same Dropbox.
- Mechanics are not evaluated
here, but do your best because it saves time.
Evaluation
Rubric
URL:
_____________________________________
Criterion
|
Value
|
Your
assessment
|
MAF's
assessment |
Complete:
[]contains all tags
[]tags match their meanings
|
7
|
|
|
Feedback:
You have summarized previous feedback and made an attempt to address
each point.
|
5
|
|
|
Mechanics
and scholarship:
[]references, in proper APA
[]grammar, spelling, formatting, etc.: as clean as possible
[]updated timeline
[]self-assessment
|
3
|
|
|
Total:
Comments:
Reference
7650 | Syllabus
| Planner | Agenda
| Assignments
| Blog | Calendar | WebCT
| MAF | SLM
1-15-09:
refreshed for 2009
Assignment created for Spring 2008
Expires
12-31-09
All rights reserved <> But
happy to share if asked <> Author mfitzger at uga.edu
http://it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger/7650/applied-project-draft1.html
Change notes 4/6/09 (after 2009 use of this
assignment): add title of project as required component; require
highlights in this version (and all previous) that show recent changes;
this works best as a Word doc; point at which it switches to online is
perhaps not specific enough? limit downloadables in final online
version.
The content and
opinions expressed on this Web page do
not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the
University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.