UGA SLM

Syllabus
it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger/6900/syllabus.html
EDIT 6900: Research in Instructional Technology
Fall Semester, 2008
UGA at Gwinnett

updated: 10-6-08
link change 11-3-08

Bottom | Home Page | Agendas | Topics | Assignments | WebCT

Schedule
Saturdays:

We will use online instruction and collaboration to fill out the balance of our time.

Instructor

Dr. Mary Ann Fitzgerald
Associate Professor
604C Aderhold Hall
(706) 542-4030, Athens
mfitzger at uga.edu
http://it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger
For more contact details, check the WebCT homepage for this course.

Office hours: call for an appointment during weekday hours.  I will usually be available before class and briefly afterwards. Please feel free to talk with me privately and at your convenience—this is part of my job. Phone conversations, emails, and face-to-face visits are all welcome. Scheduled phone appointments and online conferences work well, too.   I strive to answer email within 48 hours with the exception of weekends, holidays, and when out of town.  If you need me urgently, a phone call or phone message is the best way.  I invite you to call me at home when the situation warrants; I'll provide the phone number in class.

Course Description
Students analyze criteria for planning, selecting, using, and evaluating a variety of electronic and print resources for information services in schools.

Objectives:

The learner will be able to:
  1. Describe the processes of research, information service, and selection in the context of the overall mission of the school’s instructional program.
  2. Assume a philosophical position on the role of the research process, information services, and the selection process in schools.
  3. Describe and implement strategies for building effective information services and selection processes in a school media center.

Texts and Supplies 2008

Required:
Farmer, L.S.J. (2003). How to conduct action research: A guide for library media specialists. Chicago: American Association of School Librarians/American Library Association. ISBN 0-8389-8260-3.

We depend heavily upon the Internet in this class for communication, resources, and information inquiry.  It is essential that you have access to a reliable computer and Internet connection.  I prefer that you use Microsoft Word 2003 or Google Documents for word processed assignments to prevent file format problems (avoid the .docx format). 

Supplemental:

In addition to a word processor, you may find the  Microsoft Office programs useful, or open source equivalents. It's a good idea to carry a thumb drive to class. Laptops are welcome in class but not required (wireless access is usually available). For home use, a microphone headset is highly desirable.


Top | BottomCourse Home | Agendas | Topics | Assignments | WebCT



Topical Outline
The course syllabus is a general plan for the course; deviations announced to the class by the instructor may be necessary.  Topics are presented in a general sequence, but adjustments will be made to allow for natural unfolding of discussion.


Topic/Skill
Tag/Readings
  • Tags lead to collected resources.
  • Items specifically named are assigned reading (see the Planner).
  • I reserve the right to add or subtract readings - but any new items will be free online.
  • Using Delicious, I will link relevant online resources found during the semester to the tags below, and bundle them under 6900.
AASL Standard
What is research? (and why bother?)

Candidates identify relationships among facilities, programs, and environment that impact student learning.54
Types of research research-types (Gordon)
Candidates identify relationships among facilities, programs, and environment that impact student learning.
Exploring literature
  • search
  • Leedy & Ormrod Ch4 (WebCT)
  • Journal listing (WebCt)
  • APA Guide (WebCT)
  • Farmer 6-8
  • Farmer 37-38
Candidates model strategies to locate, evaluate and use information for specific purposes.
Establishing a theoretical frame around a problem and drafting a researchable question
Candidates model strategies to locate, evaluate and use information for specific purposes.
Synthesizing literature lit-review
Candidates model strategies to locate, evaluate and use information for specific purposes.
Critiquing research
C7 Crits
Candidates model strategies to locate, evaluate and use information for specific purposes.
Research methods and design
  • Interviews (Jones) in WebCT

Candidates are able to articulate the relationship of the library media program with current educational trends and important issues.
Ethics of research Regan (WebCt)
Candidates are able to articulate the relationship of the library media program with current educational trends and important issues.
Analyzing data (quantitative, qualitative, mixed, SLM*)
  • Farmer 9-14
  • Farmer 16-17
  • Farmer 28-36

Candidates use data for decision-making
Applying what is known to problems
  • Prove It (WebCT)
  • Farmer 37-41
Candidates interact with the learning community to access, communicate and interpret intellectual content.
SLM classic research and research stars Candidates are able to articulate the relationship of the library media program with current educational trends and important issues.
Hot trends: current research from the SLM world and other influential areas
  • Constructivistically explored through Star Exhibition
  • Identify an SLM blogger who watches and applies new ideas and research; follow for the semester; incorporate ideas as appropriate
Candidates are able to articulate the relationship of the library media program with current educational trends and important issues.
Answering the question:
How will I know if I am making a difference? (and back to the beginning: Why Bother?)
and
Sharing what you know locally and beyond
  • research-why
  • Prove-It (WebCT)
Candidates identify relationships among facilities, programs, and environment that impact student learning.
*For any students who are not SLM program majors, substitute here your own professional context.  For example, Instructional Design and Development students should discuss context-specific data analysis, IDD classic research and research stars, and IDD trends.

Instructional Strategies

Research
Case studies and scenarios
Assignments (see below)
Class discussions and small group discussions
Readings in texts and of current scholarly and practical articles
Individual presentations
Idea sharing
Reflection
Workshops
Wiki construction
Mock professional conference
Podcasts
Conferencing with instructor

Top | Course Home | Agendas | Topics | Assignments | WebCT | Bottom


Assignments

This  set of assignments may look like a collection of many small pieces.  However, if you look carefully, it's really one big assignment with two side pieces.
I will provide detailed instructions for completing each of these, which will be available near the first day of class. Due dates will be discussed on the first day.

 
Assignment
Highlighted assignments are related to each other.
Points 
(of 100 total)
Mode
(preferred)
Due

SLMS Interview (in 3 pieces - see assignment for details)
10
Individual
9/13
SLM Research Star

All 6900 and 7340 students will meet together. Each person will be responsible to research one SLM Star to present to classmates.

FAQ

10
Individual 11/1
Researchable Question

10
Ind/Group
9/27
Critique of Current Research Study

All 6900 and 7340 students will select different current, relevant research studies (one each) for an in-depth critique. These will be shared in some way in order to help both classes build a view of the current research scene.  C7 Crits
10
Individual
10/25
Draft of Problem Project

An opportunity for you to draft critical pieces of your big project for formative feedback.
10
Ind/Group
10/11
Research Design Idea

Using your same research problem, develop a brief sketch of how you might design a research project based on that question.
10
Ind/Group
11/29
Problem Project: Literature Synthesis and Presentation
Rubric | FAQ

In teams or as individuals, select a problem for in-depth study. The MS Interview is designed to provide a large menu of ideas. Formulate a research question, and review the literature, creating a concise synthesis of what is known about this problem. Formulate recommendations based on this synthesis. Present your findings to the group.
20 Ind/Group 11/15-
11/22
Researcher's Notebook or Blog

Although you will submit this electronic notebook or blog at the end of the term, you should consider it a semi-private document, written and kept for yourself and/or your team. Keep track of your materials here, and log your work. Jot your questions and concerns. It will provide material for your submitted Reflection, and also a type of evidence of your growth in this class.  It does not need to be cleaned up for submission.  There is no separate description or rubric for this assignment.  Suggested tools: Google Documents or Notebook, shared with team member(s) and me.  Submit the URL (only) to the Dropbox.
10
Ind/Group
11/22
Reflection

An overall individual reflection on your growth in this class with an emphasis on relevance between research and SLM practice. Question prompts:
  • How will you apply the research skills you've acquired in this class?
  • What did you learn about group process this semester? (This is an opportunity to address group process for good or ill.)
Please consider this a very open-ended assignment, but your remarks need not be lengthy. There is no rubric for this assignment. Please submit via the Dropbox.
10
Individual
12/1

Pacing is important, but it's impossible for me to know what other deadlines may loom in your life. We will discuss due dates on the first day of class: negotiation is possible for a couple of weeks.  After that, individuals and/or groups may negotiate individualized deadline adjustments.

Grading Policy

  1. Projects are constructed to be as authentic as possible.  They are often large and challenging, but they are also realistic.  Detailed rubrics are provided to guide students to a high standard of performance.
  2. A lot of thought goes into pacing assignments and arranging deadlines to be reasonable both for you to complete the assignments and for me to properly evaluate them.  As professionals, we mutually expect deadlines to be met. Please contact me if you have a problem with meeting a particular deadline. If an assignment is late, its score may be reduced. Also, please check with me if you feel that a deadline needs to be rescheduled, either for you personally or for the class as a whole.
  3. Communication and writing skills are essential for media specialists, Master’s candidates, and Specialist candidates. Therefore, all writing must comply with grammatical and spelling rules and should look professional in a visual sense. Please use a word processor and laser or inkjet printer and avail yourself of the spelling and grammar-checking tools provided by your software. Web sites and projected materials should receive the same level of proofreading and care that printed papers do.  If errors or appearance detract from the quality of an assignment, the score will reflect this problem. I reserve the right to return severely flawed assignments to you without a grade so that you may repair them prior to my reading.  Most assignments have a "mechanics" criterion. Items that are written for public consumption in real life -- such as web pages -- should be as close to perfect as possible, in keeping with the professionalism expected of you in the field.  Items that are more reflective or just for me to evaluate will not be held to such a high standard. 
  4. Format.  Most assignment descriptions specify the form in which each assignment should be turned in. Please pay careful attention to this detail. Most are submitted via WebCT. You should also post your assignment on your assignment page - unless privacy will be compromised (as in the case of Field Experiences).  This provides a sharing opportunity for all class members and provides backup. 
  5. As scholars, it is essential for you to give credit to any other sources consulted in the course of completing any assignment. Use in-line citations as appropriate.  List these in a reference list near the end of the project, and please follow APA style (5th edition).
  6. Resubmit option. I believe in mastery learning, a learning model in which students have the opportunity to keep working at a skill until they have accomplished it. If you receive less than a 90% score on any assignment, you may correct the problem(s) and resubmit up until the final due date.  If you choose to use this option, you must resubmit the original assignment and scoring sheet/rubric along with your revised assignment.  It is my philosophy that every student can achieve an A with sufficient effort; this class is not a competitive event, nor are student performances rated in relation to others.
  7. I follow the Graduate School's policy of using the Incomplete grade only in the case of documented illness or other unavoidable emergency.  If you feel you have the need and justification for an Incomplete, you must communicate with me as soon as possible and document your difficulty.
  8. Plus/minus grading: the Graduate School strongly encourages faculty to use plus-minus grading.  However, note that the A+ grade is not possible.  The plain "A" is the highest possible grade. A-, B+, B, B-, etc., are all possible. Scale: 94 and up = A. 90-93 = A-. 88-89 = B+. 83-87 = B. 80-82 = B-. 78-79 = C+. 73-77=C. 70-72=C-. Below that: retake class.
  9. Academic honesty. All academic work must meet the standards contained in "A Culture of Honesty." Students are responsible for informing themselves about those standards before performing any academic work. More information about academic honesty can be found at http://www.uga.edu/honesty/.
  10. Collaborative option.  I have specified the preferred mode for each assignment - individual or group. Collaboration has many benefits and is a professional competency SLMSs must have. However, it is possible to use another mode, especially for individuals to complete group assignments.  Please let me know if you want to exercise this option for any assignment.  All members of a group receive the same grade for their group's product.  If you have a problem in finding a group, please let me know; I will help match-make. Groups should be no larger than three people.
Attendance

In this class, participation is of the utmost importance. As in many graduate classes, a major benefit is interacting with your peers. To miss any class seriously compromises your learning. I expect you to have a professional attitude of wanting to participate and to contribute fully in this class, and to give it a high priority in your plans. Over the years, the high level of professionalism among our Cohorts has lead to excellent attendance.

However, family and job responsibilities at times interfere, and I understand this fact of life. Please let me know ahead of time if you need to be absent, to help my planning process.

I do not wish to be in the position of judging whether an absence should be excused or not. I will simply take attendance and figure this as a percentage of your Participation score. If I feel that excessive absences have compromised your learning, this will be reflected in your score in that category.  A pattern of absences across your semesters of work with us will cause problems, so strive to avoid this.  One way to balance out problems caused by absences is the Absentee Giveback.

One of my pet peeves is to be asked: "Sorry I was absent - what did I miss?" You are responsible for material missed, and it's up to you to ask your friends about what happened, without placing any further burden on me. I cannot repeat events that happened in class, although I make many resources available to you through this website.  The agenda will usually help you to figure out what happened.  Please talk with classmates to help you with this.  You are welcome to arrange a meeting with me so that we can plan an avenue for you to fill in the gaps in your learning, but it's your responsibility to take the initiative.

Top | Course Home | Agendas | Topics | AssignmentsWebCT | Bottom


Management

Special Needs
If you need special assistance due to a physical or learning disability, please let me know. I will be happy to accommodate you in any way that I can.
 

Assignments and Homework

I carefully set due dates for assignments that I predict will be reasonable in terms of pacing and the preparation time required.  Through negotiation and ensuing discussion, we may adjust these deadlines as we go along. Please let me know if you see that major work logjams are ahead. Course content is grouped around assignments, so advance planning is best. 

The goal of readings and "homework" assignments is to prepare all of us for class interaction.  Secondarily, these readings and activities help fill in the gaps of your knowledge that we can't cover in class.  Expect to study topics on your own until you understand them, using the many resources listed.  I often priorize readings to help you manage your tasks. The assignments call upon you to apply everything you've learned.

Unlike some professors, I find it impossible to construct a reading schedule at the beginning of the semester because I tend to adjust the agenda as we progress.  Cohort 5 requested a bi-weekly reading list, and I will continue this tradition.  That is, at the end of each class or by Wednesday following, I will post or email you a neatly bulleted preparation list for the next class.

Ground Rules

Organization
I strive to be organized. The following procedures will help us all manage our resources and time.

Communication:

Course Materials


Research

As a college professor interested in the scholarship of teaching and learning, I routinely collect, analyze, interpret, and report data as it concerns my courses, the cohort model, and the SLM Program. This allows continual improvement over time, and the opportunity to add to the body of knowledge regarding library education. My teaching journal, any electronic exchanges or online sessions, and especially samples of student work and reflections are all of interest for research purposes.  No extra work whatsoever is assigned for research purposes. No videotaping or audiotaping will be used for this purpose. Analysis will occur after semester grading is complete. If you prefer that your work in this class not be considered for purposes of research, please email your preference to me; I will cheerfully remove your material from analysis.  You may opt out at any point now or in the future.  We plan for this research to be an ongoing examination of teaching and learning within the SLM Program.  If we learn anything of value, we will publish our findings.  However, your name will never appear in any publication or presentation.   You will be given a letter explaining this research more thoroughly.

Permissions

Two release forms are associated with this class: the E-Permission form and the Research Permission form. The E-Permission forms allows us to post your creative coursework-related projects online and share them with other students (as long as no other privacy or ethical concerns are violated). Of course, your authorship is clearly indicated on any such projects and normal copyright laws apply. The Research Permission form applies to the ongoing research projects described above. Both are simple Word documents that you may download from the WebCT dropbox, type directly into, and upload back to the dropbox. For both of these, you are free to grant full permission, partial (selective) permission, or decline permission.  To avoid grading bias, I will not inspect your answers to these forms during the semester, but simply collect them electronically.



Top | Course Home | Bottom | Agendas | Topics | Assignments | WebCT
 

Fitzgerald home
SLM Program Resources

Update Log: 10/6: added C7 Crit link;
9/10: added Star FAQ. 8/30: finalized due dates (there were no complaints); 8/11/08: Day 1 version (there should be few, if any changes, after this for fall 08).
7/22/08: preliminary version for f08. Older version: 2007
Expires 12-31-08.

All rights reserved.
http://it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger/6900/syllabus.html

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.