EDIT 6340
Selection Policy
Preferred mode: Teams of 2-3
Value: 25 points
Updated
1-3-08; ready for Spring 2008
Generating a Selection Policy requires (at minimum) these skills:
In this exercise, you will work as a group to construct
the necessary components of a selection policy, ponder the difficult
philosophical issues involved (including multicultural sensitivity and
intellectual freedom), and produce a prototype that can be applied on
the job.
Task
Create a group of approximately three people. (If
you form a group of less than three people, please consult with MAF
first.) Collaboratively, construct a Selection Policy that contains the
following components:
I highly recommend that you study several examples. It is acceptable to adopt and/or adapt existing policies, but you must cite all sources and modify them to reflect the groups' beliefs and plans.
You are encouraged to tailor your policy to an existing media center. In reality, your selection policy will be constructed and approved by the Media Committee. Although you may not have the opportunity to consult a Media Committee for this assignment, don’t forget that this is a crucial step. Write the policy with your audience in mind, which will be school staff, community members, and especially parents.
The ideal versus the real: make your selection policy as real as possible, but you should strive toward the ideals of Information Power as much as you can. Committees often disagree - find a compromise. Every school and community is different, and tolerance varies. If you find that your philosophical positions are at variance with the ALA Library Bill of Rights or other ALA policies (see http://www.ala.org/), state your rationale.
Format
|
|
|
(Possible to earn all 25 points in this column) |
| Contains
all necessary components, and they are acceptable: []Cover letter for parents []Mission of school (or school goals) []Philosophy/mission (of SLMP) []Selection Principles []Annual Selection Targets []Responsibility []Selection Criteria []Copyright policy []Acceptable Use Policy []Gift policy []Weeding policy []Intellectual freedom Policy []Reconsideration procedure and Form []References Deduct proportionately for each missing or incomplete component. 8 points |
[]Something
missing: []Something incomplete: []Something does not match its definition Deduct proportional points for missing items - some "weigh" more than others. . |
[]Contains
all necessary components []Components are complete, meaning that every statement listed in the Assignment Description is honored. []Components reflect what they are defined to reflect (e.g., targets are truly annual selection targets) []Cover letter should be 1 page and appropriate for community audience []Copyright policy includes annual dissemination procedure []Weeding policy explains why and how []Internet filtering position included (can be part of AUP) []Reconsideration form included . |
| 1.3 Access
to Information (2 parts) Supports intellectual freedom and privacy of users 4 points
|
[]Reconsideration
procedures are not firm or clear []one or more significant problems with privacy or intellectual freedom []Little or no evidence of knowledge of issues related to access to information []No knowledge of the legal and ethical practices of the profession |
[]Facilitates
access to information in multiple formats:
[]Complies* with and communicates the legal and ethical codes of the profession (in addition to annual copyright dissemination) []Intellectual Freedom Position clearly stated and reasoned []Proactive steps are taken to prevent censorship and self-censorship |
| 2.1
Knowledge
of Learners
and Learning: Supports diversity 1 point |
No attention paid |
[]Proactively assesses
and addresses the needs of
diverse learners (broadly defined). Formats vary for
different styles. |
| 4.1 Managing Information Resources: Selecting, Organizing, Using (3 parts) Value: 5 |
[]Little knowledge of accepted library policies, procedures and practices for selecting, organizing, and using information | []Selects, analyzes, and
evaluates print, nonprint, and electronic resources using professional selection tools []Selects, analyzes, and evaluates print, nonprint, and electronic resources using evaluation criteria: Selection Policy articulates how to apply criteria []Selects to develop a quality collection designed to meet diverse
[]Supports intellectual freedom of users []Plans for efficient use of resources and technology to meet diverse user needs* |
| 4.2 Managing Program Resources: Human, Financial, Physical 3 points |
[]Little knowledge of
effective management
policies, procedures and principles []Misuse of human resources: no democratic involvement or assignment of professional selection tasks to unqualifed personnel |
Develops policies and procedures that:
[]Applies accepted management principles and practices that relate to personnel, financial, and operational issues* []Demonstrates MC personnel and Media Committee performing properly assigned tasks |
| 4.3 Comprehensive
and
Collaborative Strategic Planning and Assessment: Supports mission of the school 1 point |
[]Mission of school not
referenced []Connections not well articulated for a community audience |
[]Connections between
selection targets, school mission, and student learning clearly
shown (aligns
resources ... with the
school's goals and objectives) |
| Mechanics:
presentation, grammar, spelling, quality of writing; formatting;
organization; referencing Value: 2 |
[]Errors
frequently interrupt evaluator's ability to absorb content []Elements to be viewed by the community have embarrassing or unprofessional errors []Disorganized; hard to find required elements []Referencing problems or omissions |
[]A few minor
errors []Items meant for viewing by learners, co-workers, and parents are nearly perfect []Organized; headings included and/or labels applied to required elements []Clear []Consulted sources are referenced in APA 5th edition style |
| Self-assessment and
reflection Value: 1 |
[]Rubric is missing []No self-assessment []Missing individual reflections (counts against the individual, not the group) |
[]Rubric has
self-assessment []Individual reflections address group process, quality of learning experience, personal contributions |
Agenda
| Syllabus
| Assignments
Fitzgerald Home
Expires 5-31-08
All rights reserved
Update log:
1/3/08: major revision: removed Target column; collapsed some elements
and divided others; tried to eliminate redundancies; changed language
from Goals/Objectives to Principles/Targets; changed Tags to coincide
2-22: added
rationales to rubric; 2-14-07: clarification added. 2-13-07: tag list
attached; confusing highlights removed.
1-30-07: highlights of keywords in rubric. 11-3-06: table width fix for
printing. 8/06: major revision. 9/14/06: typos.
http://it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger/6340/selection-policy.html
The content and opinions expressed on this
Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed
by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.