UGA : COE : EPIT : SLM : MAF : 6340 : Assignments : Selection Policy
6340 Assignment Logo

Selection Policy
Preferred mode: Teams of 2-3
Value: 25 points


Updated 1-4-2010

A menu of all related items can be found in Netvibes, eLC, and on this slide


This assignment is explained in an audio: go to eLC-Advisement-6340-Selection Policy. Look for the file "SP Draft  Coaching."

Purpose
School Library Media Specialists must locate, evaluate, and acquire new materials guided by a thoughtful Selection Policy. There are many good reasons for having one, including providing a process for handling challenges, and facilitating the selection of resources according to a logical plan.

Generating a Selection Policy requires (at minimum) these skills:


In this exercise, you will work as a group to construct the necessary components of a selection policy, ponder the difficult philosophical issues involved (including multicultural sensitivity and intellectual freedom), and produce a prototype that can be applied on the job.
 
The following list of components follows Bishop's (2007) process very closely, although not exactly. Feel free to scrutinize her suggestions and apply them as you see fit.


Task & List of Elements for the Selection Policy
Assemble a team of two or three people. Identify an authentic school setting to base your work upon.   Collaboratively, construct a Selection Policy that contains the following components:

Section 1: Selection Policy
Section 2: One-Year Collection Development Plan

Final Elements


Format and Submission


Guidelines and Hints


Evaluation Rubric
Rubric language closely follows AASL Program Standards (2003).
Names__________________________________________________


Criterion and Value
Unacceptable
Acceptable
(1 bracket pair = 1 point)
Contains all necessary components, and they are acceptable:
[]Submission Form
[]Mission of school (or school goals)
[]Philosophy/mission (of SLMP)
[]Overview of Selection Process
[]Intellectual freedom Policy
[]Information Ethics Policy
[] Selection Principles
[]Selection Criteria
[]Responsibility
[]Gift policy
[]Weeding policy
[]Reconsideration procedure and Form
[]References
[]Annual Selection Targets

Don't forget to include:

Deduct proportionately for each missing or incomplete component.
 

6 points

Something missing:



[]Something incomplete:



[]Something does not match its definition




Deduct proportional points for missing items - some "weigh" more than others.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
[]Contains all necessary components

[]Components are complete, meaning that every statement listed in the Assignment Description is honored.

[]Components reflect what they are defined to reflect (e.g., targets are truly annual selection targets)

 
[]Weeding policy explains why and how

[]Internet filtering position included

[]Reconsideration form included
1.3 Access to Information (2 parts)

Supports intellectual freedom of users

5 points





[]Reconsideration procedures are not firm or clear

[]one or more significant problems with  intellectual freedom

[]Little or no evidence of knowledge of issues related to access to information

[]No knowledge of the legal and ethical practices of the profession

Complies with and communicates the legal and ethical codes of the profession:
[]Includes statement of intent to fully comply with information ethics

[]Provides annual copyright information dissemination procedure, and cites copyright authority


[]Demonstrates proper referencing (especially inline citations) as model for teaching students

[]Intellectual Freedom Position clearly stated and reasoned; supports intellectual freedom of users

[]Proactive steps are taken to prevent censorship and self-censorship

2.1 Knowledge of Learners and Learning:
Supports diversity

1 point
No attention paid
[]Proactively assesses and addresses the needs of diverse learners (broadly defined). Formats vary for different styles.
4.1
Managing Information Resources: Selecting, Organizing, Using



4 points
[]Little knowledge of accepted library policies, procedures and practices for selecting, organizing, and using information []Selects, analyzes, and evaluates print,
nonprint, and electronic resources
using professional selection tools

[]Selects, analyzes, and evaluates print,
nonprint, and electronic resources
using evaluation criteria:  Selection Policy articulates how to apply criteria


[]Selects to develop a quality collection designed to meet
diverse
  • curricular  needs
  • personal needs

[]Plans for efficient use of resources and technology to meet diverse user needs
4.2
Managing Program Resources



3 points
[]Little knowledge of effective management policies, procedures and principles

[]Misuse of human resources: no democratic involvement or assignment of professional selection tasks to unqualifed personnel
[]Develops policies and procedures that:
  • support the mission of the school 
  • address specific needs of the LMP

[]Applies accepted management principles and practices that relate to personnel: Selection responsibility planned for qualified personnel.

[]Plans for Media Committee participation
4.3 Comprehensive and Collaborative Strategic Planning and Assessment:
Supports mission of the school

1 point

[]Mission of school not referenced

[]Connections not well articulated for a community audience

[]Connections between selection targets, school mission, and student learning clearly shown  (aligns resources ... with the school's goals and objectives)
Mechanics: presentation, grammar, spelling, quality of writing; formatting; organization

2 points


[]Errors frequently interrupt evaluator's ability to absorb content

[]Elements to be viewed by the community have embarrassing or unprofessional errors

[]Disorganized; hard to find required elements

[]Referencing problems or omissions
[]Minimal errors:
-No more than a few minor errors
-Items meant for viewing by learners, co-workers, and learning community are nearly perfect

[1/2]Organized; headings included and/or labels applied to required elements

[1/2]Clear; reasonably concise


Self-assessment and reflection

3 points (can vary by team member)
[]Rubric is missing
[]No self-assessment
[]Missing individual reflections (counts against the individual, not the group)
[]Rubric has self-assessment (one per group)

Individual reflections address:
[]group process and personal contributions
[]quality of learning experience




References




6340 | Agenda | Syllabus | Assignments | TopicseLC | Blog
All rights reserved <> but happy to share if asked <> contact MAF
Logo by CoolText
http://it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger/6340/selection-policy.html
MAF: maryannfitz at gmail.com; other contact info on eLC/6340 start-page.

Update log: 1/4: minor. 1/2/2010: created audio coaching. 12/31/09: created global refs page elsewhere. Created reflection form. Moved Values up into body of elements. 12/30/09 created Sections 1 and 2; cover sheet becomes Google Form; re-sorted order of components; checked for redundancy (left some in [with PDEP] because we want this assignment to stand as an actual policy document).

2/20/09: added a ref. For 2009: removed Acceptable Use Policy requirement; removed Cover Letter requirement; added Cover Sheet requirement; removed tags; removed several redundancies; removed budget as part of this assignment (although students may elect to address it).1/3/08: major revision: removed Target column; collapsed some elements and divided others; tried to eliminate redundancies; changed language from Goals/Objectives to Principles/Targets; changed Tags to coincide. 2-22: added rationales to rubric; 2-14-07: clarification added. 2-13-07: tag list attached; confusing highlights removed; 1-30-07: highlights of keywords in rubric. 11-3-06: table width fix for printing. 8/06: major revision. 9/14/06: typos.


The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.