Selection
Policy Draft
Preferred mode: Team with one
individual piece
Value: 10 points
Updated 1-2-2010
A menu of all related items can be found in Netvibes,
eLC, and on this slide
Purpose
This assignment provides an early feedback opportunity for
one of the two large products required in this course. The
rationale for this assignment and full explanation for each of the
three components are given in the Selection
Policy
Assignment description.
In this exercise, you
will work as a group to construct two necessary components of a
selection
policy, and reflect as an individual upon your own stance regarding
intellectual freedom.
Full credit is given for complete
assignments, along with qualitative formative feedback. We expect
you to apply this feedback in your completed Selection Policy.
Task
First, you should read the entire Selection Policy
Assignment for context.
Create a group of two to
three people. Collaboratively, construct these essential
components of a Selection Policy:
- Selection
Principles (these do not change much from year to
year)
- Selection Criteria
- Annual
Selection Targets
- Restate the School Mission
- Base on Program Goals from PDEP
- These Targets very likely change every year.
- Accompany with Rationales that tie Target to Program goals
(PDEP), School Mission, and student achievement. Rather than an actual
link back to your PDEP, simply restate just enough of the goal to
convey the idea.
- Targets should clearly indicate the kinds of things to be
purchased.
- Develop one or more for this Draft. The
most reasonable practice is to develop Targets corresponding with your
full PDEP - because this is what you will do on the job. In
your Final Order this semester, you will
design an order to satisfy a single substantial Target. if you
only develop one, choose one that is "big" enough to require $2500 or
so.
Second (or parallel to the
tasks above), reflect deeply about the principles of intellectual
freedom. The Selection Policy requires you to state your
position as a team. While you will eventually negotiate this position
within your team, it is helpful to take time to think this through for
yourself first. You may adopt AASL's position or ALA's position
(AASL/ALA, 1998),
adapt, combine, or reject them and replace
with a statement of your
own. Write out your position,
citing any material you borrow. Most important, include your
reasoning.
To clarify, each team
member will submit a separate
intellectual freedom statement. You may ask for confidentiality
regarding this statement if you wish. It need not be that
personal, but you have this option
if you need it.
Tips
and Advice
Format
- This assignment need not be posted to
your Assignment Page.
- Group portion: post your assignment in this
Google
Form - one per team. No other documents required.
- Individual portion: post your assignment in this
Google
Form - one per person. You have the option of pasting your
entire statement in the form, or providing a link to a Google Document.
Evaluation Checklist
Group members:
|
| Component |
Value |
Your
assessment |
MAF's
Assessment |
Selection
Principles listed
|
1
|
|
|
Annual
Selection Target(s) with Rationale(s) provided
|
2
|
|
|
Rationale(s)
link to School Mission
|
1
|
|
|
| Rationale(s) refer to PDEP
Goal(s) |
1
|
|
|
Selection
Criteria listed
|
1
|
|
|
Individual:
Intellectual Freedom Statement
|
4
|
|
|
| Total |
|
|
|
Fitzgerald
Home
Expires 5-31-2010
All rights reserved
Update log: 1-1-2010: created
two forms, to replace dropboxes. Overall brush-up.
1/14/09: added bread
crumb trail. 1/5/09: revised for
2009.
2/15: refined after
grading complete for spr08. Updated 1-2-08;
created on 12-11-06
http://it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger/6340/selection-policy-draft.html
The
content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily
reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia
or the University System of Georgia.