
Procedure and Components
| Criterion |
Unacceptable |
Acceptable |
Contains all necessary components: []selection target []rationale []order list []presentation for media committee []processing checklist Value: 5 |
[]Something
missing: []Something incomplete: []Something does not match its definition Deduct proportional points for missing items - some "weigh" more than others. |
[]Contains
all necessary components []Components are complete, meaning that every statement listed in the Assignment Description is honored. []Components reflect what they are defined to reflect |
| 1.3
Access to Information Value: 3 |
[]Little or no
evidence of knowledge of issues related to access to
information []No knowledge of the legal and ethical practices of the profession |
[]Facilitates
access
to
information
in
multiple
formats
aligned with learner diversity []Complies with and communicates the legal and ethical codes of the profession (no problems found; I'm not looking for a section about this) []Proactively avoids self-censorship, thereby supporting intellectual freedom of users |
| 4.1 Managing Information Resources: Selecting, Organizing, Using Value: 8 |
[]Little knowledge of accepted library policies, procedures and practices for selecting, organizing, and using information | []Selects, analyzes, and
evaluates resources
using
professional selection
tools []Selects, analyzes, and evaluates resources using evaluation criteria; articulates how criteria were applied []Arguments for purchases are supported and logical from the learning community's point of view== Purchases are justified by explicit connections to: []MC Philosophy or mission []School improvement or Mission/Goals []SLM Program Plan (PDEP) Goal [link to the PDEP, or say in text 'this is one of our Goals'; if not - ded .25] []student learning or achievement []Organizes the LM facility and its collections (print, nonprint, and electronic) according to standard accepted practice: procedures seem complete, proper, and efficient. Here, I allow room for growth. I'm looking for a good headstart on your procedure list, with no glaring problems. |
| 4.2 Managing Program Resources: Human, Financial, Physical Value: 5 Possible misconception in
this assignment: emphasis on complete spending of allotment (to avoid
back-ordering), but not enough
emphasis on
staying within budgeted amount overall. You need to spend every
penny every year, but there's a tension between that and good
stewardship. Try to never be in the situation of "getting rid" of money
quickly, through careful planning. |
[]Little knowledge of
effective management
policies, procedures and principles []Little knowledge of relationship of facility to program needs []Explicit management problem detected: __________________ |
Applies accepted
management principles and
practices that relate to
personnel and financial issues: []Selection responsibility
carried out by qualified personnel
[]Collaboration with Media Committee evident []Money budgeted and managed properly []Money was spent, with no danger of back orders. Math is correct; total provided. Order provides adequate and accurate information for vendor's use. []New materials are promoted to the learning community. |
| Mechanics:
presentation, grammar, spelling, quality of writing; formatting;
organization; referencing Value: 2 |
[]Errors frequently
interrupt evaluator's ability to absorb content []Elements to be viewed by the community have embarrassing or unprofessional errors []Disorganized; hard to find required elements []Referencing problems or omissions |
[]A few minor
errors []Items meant for viewing by learners, co-workers, and parents are nearly perfect []Organized; headings included []Clear []Consulted sources are referenced in APA style |
| You self-assessed. Value: 1 |
[]No []Rubric is missing. |
[]Rubric has self-assessment |
| Reflection Value: 1 (individually assessed) |
Each team member
privately reflects upon: []group process []personal contribution []individual learning |
|
| Total and Comments |
Expires 5-31-2010.
Update record: 2010: Jan 13-14:examined
for redundancy (no changes); checked links; complete review and
submission format change to Forms. Jan 16: created dropbox and
worksheet. 2/4/10: finished for 2010: made NetVibes menu, eLC menu,
audio coach.
4/2/09: checked list of
fields for consideration file; this list is smaller than suggested here, but adequate. 2/20/09: ready
for 2009.
Removed tag requirement; replaced w/ Cover Sheet.
7/10/08: tweaked after
spring08 projects. 4/9: changed submission
details to electronic; 4/7: clarification re:
date in consideration file; 3/17/08: highlights
corresponding with tags; 1/9/08: removed
Target
column; changed Objective vocab to Target; removed internal and
external redundancy; recalibrated numbers; articulated overly-general
instructions; increased budget to $2500
6/11/07: added potential
changes for 08
4/2/07: link to tags added.
2/12/07: rubric resize.
9/14/06: minor typos. Aug06:
major revision.
The
content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily
reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia
or the University System of Georgia.