Library media
specialists
will often have the opportunity and need to evaluate materials
firsthand
before purchase, although these informal reviews may never be written
down.
Also, library media specialists may wish to contribute to professional
magazines by reviewing materials and having these reviews published;
there
are never enough reviewers for the many items published each
year.
Part of your challenge is keeping abreast with new materials. You can
accomplish
this through your connections with the larger library world - public,
academic,
and special libraries, and other information centers - and
through
professional organizations and publications.
Types may overlap, but
have at least one in each bulleted category. For example, you
might
select a picture storybook, a video about geology, and an educational
computer
game to review. You might choose items that would be suitable for
your preferred aged range, or you may deliberately want to sample
outside
of your familiar age-group territory. Study the item, and form a
professional
opinion about its quality and the possible contribution it might make
to
a school’s instructional program. You should also study several
reviews
published in school library journals or children's literature journals
as examples (School Library Journal, Book Report, Hornbook,
etc.).
Submission
Details
Do
all of these:
| Assignment prepared by __________________________________ Journal format followed ________________________(Provide one sample review from this journal) This IMR contains _____ (#) words; the journal I'm emulating has a limit of _____ words This rubric completed by _________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sample review provided; follows stated journal review format, including all components; provides explanation if something is missing |
No, or none stated (0) |
Mostly (.1-.9); deduct proportional to component | Completely: Editor would be very happy. (1) |
|
Did both
you and a peer assess your work, each using this rubric?
|
No (0)
|
Partly
(.1-.9)
|
Yes (1)
|
|
Does
the review make logical sense?
|
Reasons
for judgments are not given, or not well explained (0-.4)
|
Mostly
(.5)
|
Yes (1)
|
|
Is it
substantial and informative?
|
No (0)
- doesn't give a good idea of resource
|
Several
minor problems or one major problem (.1-.9)
|
Yes (1)
|
| Is the review concise? | No (0) - it's too long (check journal guidelines) | Spends too many words on summarizing, but is within limits (.3) | Yes (.5) |
| Mechanics (Punctuation, grammar, spelling, capitalization, etc.) Standard: write these as if you plan to submit for publication; i.e.: aim for perfection. |
If errors total to >.5, you must resubmit | Deduct .1 per error | Clean! (.5) |
| Total (maximum of 5 per review) | . | . | . |
| Comments |
6340 Home Page
| Agenda | Syllabus
| Assignments
Fitzgerald
Home | IT Home
Expires 5-31-05.
All rights reserved
http://it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger/6340/instructional-material-review.html