EDIT
6340
Selection
Policy Draft
Preferred mode: Team with one
individual piece
Value: 10 points
Updated 2-15-08
Purpose
This assignment provides an early feedback opportunity for
one of the two large products required in this course. The
rationale for this assignment and full explanation for each of the
three components are given in the Selection
Policy Assignment description.
In this exercise, you
will work as a group to construct two necessary components of a
selection
policy, and reflect as an individual upon your own stance regarding
intellectual freedom. Full credit is given for complete
assignments, along with qualitative formative feedback. We expect
you to apply this feedback in your completed Selection Policy.
Task
First, you should read the entire Selection Policy
Assignment for context.
Create a group of two to
three people. Collaboratively, construct these essential
components of a Selection Policy:
- Selection Principles (these do not change much from year to
year)
- Annual Selection Targets
- Restate the School Mission
- Based on Program Goals from PDEP
- These Targets very likely change every year.
- Accompanied by Rationales that tie Target to Program Goal(s)
and School Mission
- Targets should clearly indicate the kinds of things to be
purchased.
- Develop one or more for this Draft,
depending upon your PDEP. In your Final Order this semester, you will
design a collection around a single Target.
- Selection criteria
Second (or parallel to the
tasks above), reflect deeply about the principles of intellectual
freedom. The Selection Policy requires you to state your
position as a team. While you will eventually negotiate this position
within your team, it is helpful to take time to think this through for
yourself first. You may adopt AASL's position or ALA's position,
adapt it, or reject it and replace it with a statement of your
own. Write out your position (in 3 double-spaced pages or less),
citing any material you borrow. Most important, include your
reasoning. Please submit this statement with the group Selection
Policy Draft. To clarify, each team member will submit a separate
intellectual freedom statement. You may choose to seal it in an
envelope if it's still too private to share with your team
members. It need not be that personal, but you have this option
if you need it.
Tips
and Advice
Format
- This assignment need not be posted online.
- Submit one printed
copy per
group, using single-spaced paragraphs with double spaces between them,
and ample headings. List all authors at the top. Number
pages; don't use a big binder. To
save paper, I prefer front-back printing.
- Perform a group
self-assessment,
and consider collecting an outside review of Selection parts (reviewers
can be classmates or
other SLM
professionals);
submit all paperwork in one folder.
Evaluation Checklist
| Component |
Value |
Your
assessment |
MAF's
Assessment |
Selection
Principles
|
2
|
|
|
| Annual
Selection Targets with Rationales |
2
|
|
|
Rationales
link to School Mission and PDEP Goals
|
1
|
|
|
Selection
Criteria
|
1
|
|
|
Individual:
Intellectual Freedom Statement
This score will be indicated on
your printout.
|
4
|
|
|
| Total |
|
|
|
Agenda | Syllabus
| Assignments
Fitzgerald
Home
Expires 5-31-08
All rights reserved
Update log: 2/15: refined after
grading complete for spr08. Updated 1-2-08;
created on 12-11-06
http://it.coe.uga.edu/~mfitzger/6340/selection-policy-draft.html
The
content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not necessarily
reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the University of Georgia
or the University System of Georgia.